Native Americans Should Have Let the Pilgrims Starve
       
British historian EJ Hobsbawm died just over a year ago. His works
 had a tremendous 
impact on my generation of progressive historians. He 
would take a theme and 
deconstruct it by using meticulous logic and 
documentation. Hobsbawm never 
suffocated his narrative with obtuse 
theory or meta-language.
One of my favorites was a thin anthology that he co-edited with Terence Ranger titled The Invention of Tradition.
  In his introductory essay, Hobsbawm defined the invention of tradition
 as “a set of practices … of a ritual or symbolic nature, which seek to 
inculcate certain values and norms of behaviour by repetition, which 
automatically implies continuity with the past.” The invented traditions
 had a purpose, and gave a continuity of varied accuracy that formed a 
largely fictitious history.
Other historians have tied this invention of tradition to state building endeavors. 
William H. Beezley in Mexican National Identity: Memory, Innuendo, and Popular Culture
 sees identity as fashioned “in the streets”; however, there are others 
who say that very few holidays come 
from the people, tying the process 
to state building.
Essentially, the state builds a historical narrative that gives its 
citizens a sense of unity. Holidays
  are designed to give legitimacy to 
the accepted version of history that not does always conform
 to the 
Truth. It is a process that builds a “national culture.”
Deviation from this narrative disturbs people and even offends them. 
My sister would not invite me to social gatherings during the Vietnam 
War because I would bring up topics such as racism, police brutality and
 the Vietnam War. I was told that I was a party pooper, and would 
lay 
intellectual pedos (farts)—forcing people to move away.
Hobsbawm was like Rene Descartes who in the 17th century began his 
journey by questioning scholasticism, and paved the way for historical 
materialism. It was and is not easy to correct traditional narratives. 
Like toddlers people want to hear stories told the way they first 
learned them.  There are people who still cling to the story of George 
Washington cutting down the cherry tree, for instance.
The months of October and November are replete with fictitious 
versions of history.  During these to months, the state allocates 
holidays for Columbus Day, Veterans Day and Thanksgiving.  These 
official narratives become the Truth. Teachers teach students fictitious
 narratives, and in turn the public is grateful for the gift of a 
holiday.
By far the “the king of the holidays” is Thanksgiving. The narrative 
has been burned into our consciousness to the point that few Americans 
question the facts because no one wants to lay the proverbial 
intellectual pedo. Almost everyone is grateful for the day off. Merchants love Thanksgiving. It is the perfect opening act for Christmas.
The ritual of sitting down with the family to eat cheap turkey, 
chucked full of hormones, has 
been immortalized by Norman Rockwell. It 
is a day when you eat cheap turkeys and hams and everyone can pig out.
Not much thought is given to the truth of the narrative. Kids just 
want their four day relief from school, and parents are smug in the 
belief that the colonist and the Indians lived in peace. The only ones 
that care about changing the narrative are Native Americans who call it a National Day of  Mourning.I call Thanksgiving “El Día de los Pendejos” (The Day of the 
Fools). I tell my students to enjoy making graveyards out of their 
stomachs that they fill with the flesh of turkeys
that have been held 
prisoners in small dirty cages.
Why do I call the Indians fools? Because they should have let the Pilgrims starve.
Few people know that the tradition of Thanksgiving was invented 
during the Civil war by President Abraham Lincoln in October 1863 when 
he proclaimed Thanksgiving a national holiday. Thereafter, the myth of 
the Pilgrims and the Indians was constructed.The story is known by almost every American. For twelve years, from 
K-12, they learn the story of that in the early autumn of 1621 
fifty-three surviving Pilgrims celebrated a successful harvest. The 
natives joined the celebration and instead of attacking the Pilgrims 
they made peace.
The Indians were thanked: their land was stolen from them, they were 
massacred, and many lived out their lives in slavery. The consequence is
 that less than one percent of Americans have Native American blood, 
contrasted to 90 percent of Mexican Americans with indigenous blood.
It is difficult to change the narrative because most Americans love 
their myths, and they love their cheap turkey. They want to believe the 
lie that makes them feel exceptional.\There is little doubt that invented tradition strengthens 
nationalism. The elites are legitimized by the invented traditions, and 
in turn they invent other traditions. This phenomenon is not exclusive 
to the United States where it permeates political views and historical 
narratives.
No doubt that Thanksgiving happened. However, the narrative is not 
vetted, and it introduces a new set of dynamics. It affects our 
decision-making, and often clouds what is true and what is fiction.
When the French peasantry was starving in the 18th century
 because they could not afford bread, it caused widespread discontent. 
The myth was born that French Queen Marie Antoinette said, “Let them eat
 cake.” It inflamed the masses – beautiful story but it wasn’t true.
Traditional narratives are good and bad, and are difficult to 
correct. As Napoleon once said, history is the tale of the victor. Today
 the narrative belongs to the state and those who control the state.
The truth be told, Thanksgiving hides the reality of the soup 
kitchens. The corporate owned media show charitable groups passing out 
free traditional Turkey Dinners to the poor when the reality is that 
many have been deprived of jobs, food stamps, and their children have 
been robbed of free nutritious lunches. Greater numbers are homeless. 
Yet the Thanksgiving narrative shows 
us as a compassionate people – one 
big happy family.
The myth of the grateful Pilgrims permeates this narrative. In many 
ways, we are like the Indians who were robbed and killed after sharing 
our labor.The invented tradition of Thanksgiving is so much part of the 
American narrative that many people go into depression if they cannot 
celebrate it with family and friends. Psychologists say that it is the 
worse time of the year to be alone; loneliness causes a social anxiety 
disorder (SAD).Thanksgiving is the ultimate example of social control, and the 
invented reality that Americans like the pilgrims were justified in 
stealing the land and killing the people.
Our lives become one big Thanksgiving for being an American. The 
Sierra Club reports “that the average American will drain as many 
resources as 35 natives of India and consume 53 times more goods and 
services than someone from China … With less than 5 percent of world 
population, the U.S. uses one-third of the world’s paper, a quarter of 
the world’s oil, 23 percent of the coal, 27 percent of the aluminum, and
 19 percent of the copper.”
There is a similar gap between the poor and the 1 percent in 
America.  The fictitious history 
alleviates our guilt, and we forget the
 reasons why some people are in food lines, and 
others are eating cheap 
hormone infected birds, while a few eat organic turkey.
Not knowing, not questioning makes this El Día de los Pendejos. We 
are fools because we don’t question the narrative. It is why we keep 
repeating injustices.
So now pass me the gravy.
RODOLFO ACUÑA, a professor emeritus at 
California State University Northridge, has published 20 books and over 
200 public and scholarly articles. He is the founding chair of the first
 Chicano Studies Dept which today offers 166 sections per semester in 
Chicano Studies. His history book Occupied America has
 been banned in Arizona. In solidarity with Mexican Americans in Tucson,
 he has organized fundraisers and support groups to ground zero and 
written over two dozen articles exposing efforts there to nullify the 
U.S.Constitution











 
 
 
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment